Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and W230 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 4 years after the W230 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the W230 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony W230
| EX-ZR800 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| W230 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony W230
| EX-ZR800 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony W230 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the W230.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and W230 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and W230.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $429 | $180 |