Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and W230 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 4 years after the W230 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the W230 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony W230
| EX-ZR800 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| W230 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony W230
| EX-ZR800 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony W230 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the W230.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and W230 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and W230.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $429 | $180 |