Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years after the W320 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony W320
| EX-ZR800 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 44 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| W320 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony W320
| EX-ZR800 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the W320.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and W320.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $269 |