Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as FinePix S205EXR
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZS10 was unveiled 18 months later than the S200EXR which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the S200EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZS10
| S200EXR | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 comes with physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZS10 versus FujiFilm S200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the S200EXR.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and S200EXR is 99 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The visual underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and S200EXR.
All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZS10 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZS10 will give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The newer EX-ZS10 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-140 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $120 | $500 |