Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as FinePix S205EXR
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZS10 was unveiled 18 months later than the S200EXR which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the S200EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZS10
| S200EXR | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 comes with physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZS10 versus FujiFilm S200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the S200EXR.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and S200EXR is 99 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The visual underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and S200EXR.
All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZS10 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZS10 will give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The newer EX-ZS10 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-140 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $120 | $500 |