Clicky

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR

Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
Portability
54
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs

Casio EX-ZS10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2011
FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Also Known as FinePix S205EXR
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview

Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZS10 was unveiled 18 months later than the S200EXR which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the S200EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-ZS10 S200EXR 
IntroducedJanuary 2011July 2009Fresher by 18 months

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZS10

 S200EXR EX-ZS10 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen dimensions2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-ZS10 S200EXR 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 comes with physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-ZS10 versus FujiFilm S200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the S200EXR.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and S200EXR is 99 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The visual underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and S200EXR.

All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZS10 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZS10 will give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The newer EX-ZS10 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Portrait photography advice
FujiFilm S200EXR Portrait photography advice
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
45
focusing manually
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Street photography info
FujiFilm S200EXR Street photography info
49
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/1.6")
more heavy than others in class (865 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Sports photography camera
FujiFilm S200EXR as a Sports photography camera
32
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
34
amazing zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZS10
Travel photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
71
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
very good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
38
has built in flash
great zoom (436mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (865 grams)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Landscape photography highlights
FujiFilm S200EXR Landscape photography highlights
33
very good maximum aperture (f)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
screen is somewhat small ( inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
34
focusing manually
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Vlogging details
FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging details
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
19
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (865g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZS10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZS10 and FujiFilm S200EXR
 Casio Exilim EX-ZS10FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
Also referred to as - FinePix S205EXR
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-01-05 2009-07-22
Physical type Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - EXR
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.6"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8 x 6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 48.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO - 3200
Max boosted ISO - 12800
Minimum native ISO - 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 31-436mm (14.1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.3
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing - 2.7"
Screen resolution 0 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 7.20 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 865 grams (1.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-140
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $120 $500