Clicky

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320

Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZS10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
  • Released January 2011
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-ZS10 was released 2 years later than the M320 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZS10 scores versus the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Kodak M320

 EX-ZS10 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2009More recent by 25 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-ZS10

 M320 EX-ZS10 
Display dimension2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Kodak M320

 EX-ZS10 M320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 enjoys physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZS10 versus the M320.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and M320 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The visual below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and M320.

To sum up, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS10 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-ZS10 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZS10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Street photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
49
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
maximum ISO low (0)
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Sports photography camera
32
megapixel count decent (14MP)
includes tracking focus
focal length is fixed (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZS10
Travel photography with Kodak M320
71
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (155g)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
33
very good max aperture (f)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
screen is small (")
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Vlogging factors
Kodak M320 Vlogging factors
27
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZS10 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-ZS10Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Make Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 Kodak EasyShare M320
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2011-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 3472 x 2604
Max native ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO - 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal - 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 0 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed - 4 secs
Max shutter speed - 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 155 grams (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - KLIC-7001
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $120 $39