Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZS10 was introduced 13 months later than the M575 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZS10 matches up versus the M575 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Kodak M575
| EX-ZS10 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-ZS10
| M575 | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Kodak M575
| EX-ZS10 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS10 enjoys physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the M575.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and M575 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and M575.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos but you will need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-ZS10 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | - | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 152g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $120 | $139 |