Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
![Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10/Casio-EX-ZS10-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S6400 front Nikon Coolpix S6400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400/Nikon-S6400-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Launched August 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-ZS10 and Nikon S6400, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the S6400 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZS10 was launched 19 months earlier than the S6400 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZS10 grades vs the S6400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Nikon Coolpix S6400. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Nikon S6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Nikon S6400
EX-ZS10 | S6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Casio EX-ZS10
S6400 | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Nikon S6400
EX-ZS10 | S6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZS10 features outside dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Nikon S6400 has proportions of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZS10 and Nikon S6400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS10 compared to the S6400.
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 size comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and S6400 is 99 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS10 and S6400.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon S6400 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZS10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Nikon S6400 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2012-08-22 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | - | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | - | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $120 | $500 |