Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZS10 and Olympus VG-160, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZS10 was revealed 12 months prior to the VG-160 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the VG-160 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Olympus VG-160
| EX-ZS10 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-ZS10
| VG-160 | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Olympus VG-160
| EX-ZS10 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS10 features exterior dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZS10 and Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS10 compared to the VG-160.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and VG-160 is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS10 and VG-160.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs although you should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-70B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $120 | $90 |