Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZS10 was brought out 17 months later than the CX2 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZS10 scores against the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Ricoh CX2
| EX-ZS10 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Casio EX-ZS10
| CX2 | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh CX2
| EX-ZS10 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZS10 has got outer measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZS10 against the CX2.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS10 and CX2 is 99 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and CX2.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZS10 to offer greater detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZS10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | - | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $120 | $341 |