Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
90 Imaging
56 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Ricoh GR, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is fairly close but the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZS10 was unveiled 3 years before the GR and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZS10 grades vs the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-ZS10 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-ZS10
| GR | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 27 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 0k | Crisper display (+1230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR
| EX-ZS10 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZS10 enjoys outer dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Ricoh GR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS10 versus the GR.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and GR is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS10 and GR.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZS10 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR will render more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZS10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 0k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 300 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $120 | $971 |