Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZS10 was launched 18 months after the GR Digital III making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-ZS10 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-ZS10
GR Digital III | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Clearer display (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-ZS10 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS10 provides physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the GR Digital III.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and GR Digital III is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and GR Digital III.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZS10 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZS10 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZS10 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 3" |
Screen resolution | 0k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $120 | $399 |