Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh GR
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR II, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the GR II (16MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZS10 was launched 5 years prior to the GR II and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the GR II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Ricoh GR II
EX-ZS10 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Casio EX-ZS10
GR II | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | January 2011 | Fresher by 54 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+1230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR II
EX-ZS10 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 offers outer dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GR II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the GR II.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS10 and GR II is 99 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZS10 and GR II.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZS10 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR II will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-ZS10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GR II |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2015-06-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | - | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 0k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 251g (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $120 | $599 |