Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
86 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX210
- Later Model is Samsung NX500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung NX300, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZS10 was introduced 3 years before the NX300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZS10 matches up versus the NX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Samsung NX300. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung NX300
| EX-ZS10 | NX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Casio EX-ZS10
| NX300 | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 35 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.3" | " | Bigger screen (+3.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 768k | 0k | Sharper screen (+768k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung NX300
| EX-ZS10 | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZS10 provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the NX300.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and NX300 is 99 and 86 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS10 and NX300.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS10 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX300 will deliver greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZS10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung NX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung NX300 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-11-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | - | 3.3 inch |
| Display resolution | 0k dots | 768k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 331g (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $120 | $750 |