Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29


99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is very close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZS10 was revealed at a similar time to the ST65 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Samsung ST65. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung ST65
EX-ZS10 | ST65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-ZS10
ST65 | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung ST65
EX-ZS10 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZS10 has got exterior measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZS10 against the ST65.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and ST65 is 99 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and ST65.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures although you should always factor the production date of the cameras into account.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung ST65 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | - | - |
Minimum native ISO | - | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | () |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 3" |
Screen resolution | 0k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $120 | $130 |