Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Samsung ST700, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZS10 was brought out within a month of the ST700 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZS10 matches up versus the ST700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Samsung ST700. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung ST700
EX-ZS10 | ST700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-ZS10
ST700 | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung ST700
EX-ZS10 | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | January 2011 | Same generation | |
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS10 has got external measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung ST700 has measurements of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Samsung ST700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS10 and the ST700.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and ST700 is 99 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and ST700.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung ST700 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung ST700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung ST700 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | - | - |
Minimum native ISO | - | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | () |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse feature | ||
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $120 | $280 |