Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST93

Here is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZS10 was manufactured 3 months before the ST93 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZS10 scores versus the ST93 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Samsung ST93. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.

In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZS10 comes with exterior measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung ST93 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZS10 against the ST93.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and ST93 is 99 and 97 respectively.

Often, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and ST93.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung ST93 to offer you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively.