Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB2200F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZS10 was released 4 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZS10 matches up vs the WB2200F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-ZS10 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZS10
| WB2200F | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-ZS10 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 has got external measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS10 against the WB2200F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and WB2200F is 99 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB2200F to show more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZS10 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | - | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 1/8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 708 gr (1.56 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-1410 |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $120 | $599 |