Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
![Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10/Casio-EX-ZS10-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB30F/Samsung-WB30F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Samsung WB30F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZS10 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the WB30F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-ZS10 scores versus the WB30F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-ZS10 | WB30F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZS10
WB30F | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB30F
EX-ZS10 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZS10 comes with exterior measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZS10 versus Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZS10 versus the WB30F.
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Samsung-WB30F-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and WB30F is 99 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Samsung-WB30F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and WB30F.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB30F to give extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZS10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Samsung-WB30F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-vs-Samsung-WB30F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB30F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | - | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | - | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 0k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 128 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $120 | $180 |