Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB50F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZS10 was released 4 years prior to the WB50F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZS10 matches up versus the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZS10 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-ZS10
| WB50F | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZS10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZS10 offers external measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB50F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZS10 compared to the WB50F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and WB50F is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and WB50F.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB50F to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZS10 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | - | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $120 | $180 |