Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZS10 was revealed 24 months before the WB800F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZS10 matches up against the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZS10 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZS10
| WB800F | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZS10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS10 has got external measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZS10 against the WB800F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and WB800F is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and WB800F.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to produce extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-ZS10 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 0k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $120 | $300 |