Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZS10 was introduced 4 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZS10 scores versus the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-ZS10 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-ZS10
| DP2 Quattro | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-ZS10 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS10 offers outer measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZS10 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and DP2 Quattro is 99 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS10 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 45mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | - | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 0 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $120 | $931 |