Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
95 Imaging
37 Features
15 Overall
28
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-ZS15 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") boast different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZS15 was revealed 2 years after the S200EXR which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS15 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZS15 scores vs the S200EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS15 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZS15
| S200EXR | EX-ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS15 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS15 offers external dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the FujiFilm S200EXR has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZS15 vs the S200EXR.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS15 and S200EXR is 95 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZS15 and S200EXR.
To sum up, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZS15 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Casio EX-ZS15 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZS15 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZS15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-07-18 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lbs) | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-140 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $248 | $500 |