Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200
95 Imaging
36 Features
15 Overall
27
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZS15 and Fujifilm S9200, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZS15 was launched 3 years prior to the Fujifilm S9200 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS15 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZS15 scores vs the Fujifilm S9200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 and Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery and Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Fujifilm S9200
| EX-ZS15 | Fujifilm S9200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-ZS15
| Fujifilm S9200 | EX-ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and Fujifilm S9200
| EX-ZS15 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZS15 comes with physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZS15 and Fujifilm S9200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS15 compared to the Fujifilm S9200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS15 and Fujifilm S9200 is 95 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS15 and Fujifilm S9200.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S9200 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-ZS15 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-07-18 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lbs) | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $248 | $300 |