Clicky

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
15
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
31
Overall
36

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZS15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the EX-ZS15 (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The EX-ZS15 was introduced 6 years later than the E-300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZS15 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZS15 scores against the E-300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Olympus E-300

 EX-ZS15 E-300 
LaunchedJuly 2011January 2005More recent by 80 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Casio EX-ZS15

 E-300 EX-ZS15 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display sizing1.8""Larger display (+1.8")
Display resolution134k0kCrisper display (+134k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300

 EX-ZS15 E-300 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS15 provides exterior measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-300 has measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS15 versus the E-300.

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS15 and E-300 is 95 and 67 respectively.

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS15 and E-300.

Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS15 using its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-ZS15 will give extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZS15 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZS15
Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZS15 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition in class (154g)
low max ISO (0)
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZS15 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
32
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
36
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZS15
Travel photography with Olympus E-300
61
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (154 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
44
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZS15 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
32
great max aperture (f)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
small screen (")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
42
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZS15 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
25
great max aperture (f)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (154g)
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300
 Casio Exilim EX-ZS15Olympus E-300
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 Olympus E-300
Also called - EVOLT E-300
Category Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2011-07-18 2005-01-10
Physical type Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 8MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO - 400
Highest boosted ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO - 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range () -
Number of lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing - 1.8"
Resolution of screen 0k dots 134k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 60s
Highest shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 154g (0.34 pounds) 624g (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $248 $800