Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300
95 Imaging
36 Features
15 Overall
27
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the EX-ZS15 (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZS15 was introduced 6 years later than the E-300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZS15 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZS15 scores against the E-300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery and Olympus E-300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Olympus E-300
| EX-ZS15 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | January 2005 | More recent by 80 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Casio EX-ZS15
| E-300 | EX-ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display sizing | 1.8" | " | Larger display (+1.8") | |
| Display resolution | 134k | 0k | Crisper display (+134k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300
| EX-ZS15 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZS15 provides exterior measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-300 has measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZS15 and Olympus E-300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS15 versus the E-300.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS15 and E-300 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS15 and E-300.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS15 using its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-ZS15 will give extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZS15 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Olympus E-300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Olympus E-300 |
| Also called | - | EVOLT E-300 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2011-07-18 | 2005-01-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 8MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | () | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 1.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 134k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 624g (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $248 | $800 |