Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
37 Features
15 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZS15 was revealed 4 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZS15 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZS15 grades vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZS15 | WG-M1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-ZS15
| WG-M1 | EX-ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | July 2011 | Newer by 38 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 1.5" | " | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 115k | 0k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-ZS15 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZS15 has outer dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZS15 and the WG-M1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS15 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS15 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of images although you need to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZS15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-07-18 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | - | 800 |
| Min native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 1.5" |
| Display resolution | 0 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $248 | $2,000 |