Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H
95 Imaging
36 Features
15 Overall
27
78 Imaging
70 Features
59 Overall
65
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZS15 and Sigma Quattro H, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-ZS15 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) have different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZS15 was introduced 5 years before the Quattro H and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS15 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZS15 grades vs the Quattro H in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Sigma Quattro H
| EX-ZS15 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-ZS15
| Quattro H | EX-ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | July 2011 | More recent by 56 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 0k | Crisper screen (+1620k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and Sigma Quattro H
| EX-ZS15 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZS15 provides outside measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZS15 and Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZS15 vs the Quattro H.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS15 and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS15 and Quattro H.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS15 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro H will render greater detail using its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZS15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-07-18 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | - | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $248 | $1,134 |