Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
36 Features
15 Overall
27
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 154g - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZS15 versus Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZS15 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZS15 was launched 2 years after the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZS15 matches up vs the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS15 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS15 over the Sony T900
| EX-ZS15 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-ZS15
| T900 | EX-ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS15 and Sony T900
| EX-ZS15 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS15 provides outer measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZS15 versus Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS15 compared to the T900.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS15 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS15 and T900.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZS15 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZS15 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZS15 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-07-18 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 0k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $248 | $300 |