Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
99 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 848 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZS5 versus FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZS5 (14MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZS5 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") use different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZS5 was released 18 months later than the S200EXR which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZS5 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZS5 matches up vs the S200EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS5 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS5 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS5 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZS5
| S200EXR | EX-ZS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS5 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-ZS5 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZS5 provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the FujiFilm S200EXR has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZS5 versus FujiFilm S200EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS5 and the S200EXR.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS5 and S200EXR is 99 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The visual here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZS5 and S200EXR.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZS5 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZS5 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger EX-ZS5 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZS5 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Otherwise known as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 865 grams (1.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-140 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $500 |