Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
99 Imaging
37 Features
23 Overall
31
![Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 front Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS5/Casio-EX-ZS5-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR/Fujifilm-F200EXR-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 848 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-ZS5 and Fujifilm F200EXR, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZS5 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-ZS5 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") possess different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZS5 was introduced 21 months after the Fujifilm F200EXR making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZS5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZS5 scores versus the Fujifilm F200EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS5 Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS5 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZS5 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-ZS5
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-ZS5 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS5 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZS5 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS5 comes with physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZS5 and Fujifilm F200EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZS5 vs the Fujifilm F200EXR.
![Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS5-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS5 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 99 and 93 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS5-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS5 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZS5 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZS5 will provide greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZS5 provides an edge in sensor tech.
![Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS5-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS5-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-04-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $100 | $350 |