Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320
99 Imaging
37 Features
23 Overall
31
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 848 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZS5 (14MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-ZS5 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZS5 was unveiled 2 years after the M320 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZS5 grades vs the M320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS5 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS5 over the Kodak M320
| EX-ZS5 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-ZS5
| M320 | EX-ZS5 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS5 and Kodak M320
| EX-ZS5 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZS5 provides physical dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZS5 and the M320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS5 and M320 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS5 and M320.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZS5 using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Casio EX-ZS5 will result in extra detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZS5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $100 | $39 |
