Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95
99 Imaging
37 Features
23 Overall
31


99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 848 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011

Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZS5 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZS5 was revealed very close to the ST95 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZS5 scores versus the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 and Samsung ST95. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZS5 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS5 over the Samsung ST95
EX-ZS5 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-ZS5
ST95 | EX-ZS5 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS5 and Samsung ST95
EX-ZS5 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS5 features external dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS5 compared to the ST95.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS5 and ST95 is 99 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS5 and ST95.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung ST95 to offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.

Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Samsung ST95 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | () |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse shooting | ||
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $100 | $145 |