Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F
99 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 848 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZS5 versus Samsung WB30F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZS5 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZS5 was launched 24 months prior to the WB30F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZS5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZS5 scores against the WB30F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS5 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS5 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZS5 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZS5
| WB30F | EX-ZS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS5 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZS5 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZS5 has exterior dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZS5 versus Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZS5 compared to the WB30F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS5 and WB30F is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS5 and WB30F.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB30F to result in more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZS5 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $100 | $180 |