Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
39 Features
16 Overall
29
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AX355
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio TRYX versus FujiFilm AX350, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and AX350 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TRYX was unveiled very close to the AX350 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm AX350 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TRYX matches up vs the AX350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & FujiFilm FinePix AX350. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & FujiFilm AX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm AX350
| TRYX | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Casio TRYX
| AX350 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm AX350
| TRYX | AX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX has got external measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the FujiFilm AX350 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio TRYX versus FujiFilm AX350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the TRYX vs the AX350.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and AX350 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The graphic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and AX350.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the FujiFilm AX350 to give greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AX350 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix AX355 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3440 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 33-165mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 images |
| Battery format | - | AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $689 | $0 |
