Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
78 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Other Name is FinePix S2600HD
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the S2500HD (12MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TRYX was unveiled 7 months after the S2500HD so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S2500HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TRYX matches up against the S2500HD with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm S2500HD
| TRYX | S2500HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2500HD over the Casio TRYX
| S2500HD | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm S2500HD
| TRYX | S2500HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX has got physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the FujiFilm S2500HD has sizing of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs).
Contrast the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the TRYX vs the S2500HD.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and S2500HD is 99 and 78 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The image here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and S2500HD.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos although you will need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern TRYX is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2500HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix S2600HD |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 99 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 337 gr (0.74 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $689 | $200 |