Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
![Casio Exilim TRYX front Casio Exilim TRYX front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-TRYX/Casio-TRYX-front.jpg)
![FujiFilm FinePix S2950 front FujiFilm FinePix S2950 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2950/FujiFilm-S2950-front.jpg)
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix S2990
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm S2950, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the S2950 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The TRYX was announced at a similar time to the S2950 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TRYX grades versus the S2950 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & FujiFilm FinePix S2950. The whole galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & FujiFilm S2950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm S2950
TRYX | S2950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Casio TRYX
S2950 | TRYX |
---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm S2950
TRYX | S2950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the FujiFilm S2950 has measurements of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs).
Examine the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm S2950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TRYX against the S2950.
![Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 size comparison Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-TRYX-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S2950-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and S2950 is 99 and 76 respectively.
![Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 top view buttons comparison Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-TRYX-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S2950-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and S2950.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the FujiFilm S2950 to offer extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
![Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 sensor size comparison Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-TRYX-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S2950-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-TRYX-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S2950-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/greggs-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S2950 Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 |
Also called as | - | FinePix S2990 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 437 grams (0.96 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Form of battery | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $689 | $330 |