Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S3250
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the S3200 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TRYX was unveiled at a similar time to the S3200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the TRYX scores against the S3200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX and FujiFilm FinePix S3200. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery and FujiFilm S3200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm S3200
| TRYX | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Casio TRYX
| S3200 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm S3200
| TRYX | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX provides outside measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the FujiFilm S3200 has proportions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Check the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the TRYX against the S3200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and S3200 is 99 and 67 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and S3200.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the FujiFilm S3200 to produce greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm S3200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix S3250 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 540 grams (1.19 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $689 | $190 |