Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the T200 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TRYX was released at a similar time to the T200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm T200 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TRYX matches up vs the T200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX and FujiFilm FinePix T200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery and FujiFilm T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm T200
| TRYX | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Casio TRYX
| T200 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm T200
| TRYX | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the FujiFilm T200 has proportions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the TRYX and the T200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and T200 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and T200.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the FujiFilm T200 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix T200 |
| Otherwise known as | - | FinePix T205 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.4-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.60 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $689 | $160 |