Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 140g - 93 x 60 x 27mm
- Revealed July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm A170 (10MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TRYX was introduced 18 months later than the Fujifilm A170 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm A170 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TRYX matches up against the Fujifilm A170 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm FinePix A170. The whole galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm A170 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm A170
| TRYX | Fujifilm A170 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm A170 over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm A170 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm A170
| TRYX | Fujifilm A170 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX comes with exterior measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Fujifilm A170 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the TRYX vs the Fujifilm A170.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and Fujifilm A170 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Fujifilm A170.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio TRYX to offer greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer TRYX will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm A170 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix A170 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix A170 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 93 x 60 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $689 | $80 |