Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31


91 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and Fujifilm F600 EXR (16MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F600 EXR (1/2") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

The TRYX was revealed 7 months earlier than the Fujifilm F600 EXR and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F600 EXR being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TRYX matches up vs the Fujifilm F600 EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX and Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery and Fujifilm F600 EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm F600 EXR
TRYX | Fujifilm F600 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F600 EXR over the Casio TRYX
Fujifilm F600 EXR | TRYX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm F600 EXR
TRYX | Fujifilm F600 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio TRYX has external measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F600 EXR has specifications of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TRYX versus the Fujifilm F600 EXR.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and Fujifilm F600 EXR is 99 and 91 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Fujifilm F600 EXR.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TRYX with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Fujifilm F600 EXR will result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older TRYX will be behind in sensor tech.

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-08-11 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (HD 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), High Speed Movie (80 / 160 / 320 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | AVI MPEG4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 153 |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $689 | $230 |