Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") use different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The TRYX was unveiled 3 years prior to the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the TRYX scores against the Fujifilm F900EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 TRYX Fujifilm F900EXR 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Casio TRYX

 Fujifilm F900EXR TRYX 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2011More recent by 25 months
Screen resolution920k461kCrisper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm F900EXR

 TRYX Fujifilm F900EXR 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX provides outside measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).

Check the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TRYX versus the Fujifilm F900EXR.

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm F900EXR is 99 and 90 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and Fujifilm F900EXR.

As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TRYX using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Fujifilm F900EXR will show more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older TRYX will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX Portrait photography highlights
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography highlights
21
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
43
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW formats
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio TRYX
Street photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
58
fully articulated screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
68
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (232 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography factors
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography factors
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
55
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
supports phase detect auto focus
sensor is small (1/2")
low battery (260 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Travel photography camera
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
56
screen is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
66
lighter than average in class (232 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low battery (260 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio TRYX
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
28
nice screen size (3 inch)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
47
pretty wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2")
low battery (260 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging factors
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging factors
62
screen is selfie friendly
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
missing external microphone socket
34
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (232 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Fujifilm F900EXR
 Casio Exilim TRYXFujifilm FinePix F900EXR
General Information
Brand Name Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-01-05 2013-01-30
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS EXR II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS EXRCMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.4 x 4.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 30.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO - 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 25-500mm (20.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/3.5-5.3
Macro focusing distance 8cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.6
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/8s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 11.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 232 gr (0.51 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 pictures
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-50A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat))
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $689 $380