Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm JZ200, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TRYX was brought out 12 months before the Fujifilm JZ200 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TRYX matches up against the Fujifilm JZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX and Fujifilm FinePix JZ200. The entire galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm JZ200
| TRYX | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm JZ200 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm JZ200
| TRYX | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio TRYX provides physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Fujifilm JZ200 has specifications of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm JZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TRYX and the Fujifilm JZ200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm JZ200 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and Fujifilm JZ200.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm JZ200 to give extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older TRYX is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm JZ200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.60 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 135 grams (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $689 | $0 |