Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio TRYX versus Fujifilm S2000HD, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TRYX was unveiled 24 months after the Fujifilm S2000HD which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the TRYX grades versus the Fujifilm S2000HD when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| TRYX | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm S2000HD | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm S2000HD
| TRYX | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX enjoys physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2000HD has sizing of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Look at the Casio TRYX versus Fujifilm S2000HD in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TRYX against the Fujifilm S2000HD.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and Fujifilm S2000HD is 99 and 75 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Fujifilm S2000HD.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio TRYX to resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer TRYX is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-414mm (14.8x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 426 grams (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $689 | $280 |