Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
75 Imaging
33 Features
26 Overall
30
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 405g - 111 x 78 x 79mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm S8100fd, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm S8100fd (10MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TRYX was launched 24 months later than the Fujifilm S8100fd which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S8100fd being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TRYX matches up against the Fujifilm S8100fd in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd. The complete galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm S8100fd
| TRYX | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8100fd over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm S8100fd | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm S8100fd
| TRYX | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX has physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8100fd has dimensions of 111mm x 78mm x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs).
Compare the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm S8100fd in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the TRYX and the Fujifilm S8100fd.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm S8100fd is 99 and 75 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Fujifilm S8100fd.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio TRYX to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer TRYX is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8100fd Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m (Auto ISO (800)) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 30 fps, 320 x 240 30 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 405 grams (0.89 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 111 x 78 x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $689 | $300 |