Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Casio TRYX versus Fujifilm S9200, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TRYX was released 4 years before the Fujifilm S9200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TRYX grades versus the Fujifilm S9200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The complete galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm S9200
| TRYX | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm S9200 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm S9200
| TRYX | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9200 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX versus Fujifilm S9200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TRYX versus the Fujifilm S9200.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and Fujifilm S9200 is 99 and 61 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and Fujifilm S9200.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9200 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TRYX is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 670g (1.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $689 | $300 |