Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm SL240, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TRYX was revealed 12 months before the Fujifilm SL240 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the TRYX matches up against the Fujifilm SL240 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX and Fujifilm FinePix SL240. The full galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Fujifilm SL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm SL240
| TRYX | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm SL240 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm SL240
| TRYX | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm SL240 has dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm SL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the TRYX compared to the Fujifilm SL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and Fujifilm SL240 is 99 and 67 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and Fujifilm SL240.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm SL240 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older TRYX is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm SL240 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 510 gr (1.12 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-85 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $689 | $280 |