Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched April 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TRYX was revealed 3 months before the Fujifilm Z900EXR and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TRYX matches up against the Fujifilm Z900EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. The full galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| TRYX | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm Z900EXR
| TRYX | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | April 2011 | Similar age |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm Z900EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TRYX vs the Fujifilm Z900EXR.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Fujifilm Z900EXR.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TRYX with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will offer you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-04-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | EXR |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $689 | $380 |