Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Announced January 2011
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Casio TRYX and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") feature different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The TRYX was manufactured 2 years after the M320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TRYX scores against the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak M320

 TRYX M320 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 25 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio TRYX

 M320 TRYX 

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak M320

 TRYX M320 
Manual focus No manual focus
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio TRYX comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Casio TRYX and Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TRYX against the M320.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and M320 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and M320.

As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TRYX featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Casio TRYX will offer more detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent TRYX should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
21
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio TRYX Street photography factors
Kodak M320 Street photography factors
58
screen articulates
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than others (155g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography details
Kodak M320 Sports photography details
17
can't change focal length (21mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX Travel photography factors
Kodak M320 Travel photography factors
56
selfie friendly screen
missing Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (155 grams)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio TRYX
Landscape photography with Kodak M320
28
screen size is good (3 inch)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (21mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio TRYX
Vlogging with Kodak M320
62
selfie friendly screen
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
missing microphone port
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone jack
more heavy than others (155g)
Photography Glossary

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim TRYXKodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Company Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim TRYX Kodak EasyShare M320
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 21mm (1x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus distance 8cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $689 $39