Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio TRYX and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") feature different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe TRYX was manufactured 2 years after the M320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TRYX scores against the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak M320
TRYX | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio TRYX
M320 | TRYX |
---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak M320
TRYX | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio TRYX comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX and Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TRYX against the M320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and M320 is 99 and 95 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and M320.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TRYX featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Casio TRYX will offer more detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent TRYX should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M320 Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $689 | $39 |