Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio TRYX versus Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the M340 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TRYX was revealed 2 years later than the M340 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the TRYX grades against the M340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX and Kodak EasyShare M340. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak M340
| TRYX | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio TRYX
| M340 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak M340
| TRYX | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M340 has sizing of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Casio TRYX versus Kodak M340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TRYX and the M340.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and M340 is 99 and 96 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and M340.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio TRYX to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer TRYX provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio TRYX vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 115g (0.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $689 | $130 |