Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341

Portability
99
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Launched January 2011
Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced July 2009
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Casio TRYX and Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the M341 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The TRYX was launched 18 months after the M341 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TRYX matches up vs the M341 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak M341

 TRYX M341 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011July 2009More modern by 18 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Casio TRYX

 M341 TRYX 

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak M341

 TRYX M341 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Kodak M341 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).

Examine the Casio TRYX and Kodak M341 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the TRYX and the M341.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and M341 is 99 and 96 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and M341.

To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of pictures though you have to take the age of the products into consideration. The more modern TRYX should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M341 as a Portrait photography camera
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
21
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Casio TRYX Street photography details
Kodak M341 Street photography details
59
screen articulates fully
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography details
Kodak M341 Sports photography details
18
focal length is fixed (21mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX Travel photography highlights
Kodak M341 Travel photography highlights
56
selfie friendly screen
does not have Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
52
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX Landscape photography information
Kodak M341 Landscape photography information
28
screen size is decent (3")
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
28
good sized screen (3 inches)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging information
Kodak M341 Vlogging information
62
selfie friendly screen
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
does not have external microphone socket
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M341 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Kodak M341
 Casio Exilim TRYXKodak EasyShare M341
General Information
Brand Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Kodak EasyShare M341
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2011-01-05 2009-07-29
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focusing range 8cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.20 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 135 gr (0.30 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $689 $130