Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Kodak EasyShare M380 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
13
Overall
24

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Released January 2011
Kodak M380
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the M380 (10MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TRYX was announced 2 years after the M380 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TRYX scores vs the M380 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak M380

 TRYX M380 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2009Newer by 25 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Casio TRYX

 M380 TRYX 

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak M380

 TRYX M380 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M380 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TRYX compared to the M380.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and M380 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and M380.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio TRYX to give extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer TRYX is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M380 as a Portrait photography camera
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
19
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio TRYX
Street photography with Kodak M380
58
screen articulates fully
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (155g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography highlights
Kodak M380 Sports photography highlights
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,448 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M380 as a Travel photography camera
56
selfie friendly display
no Time Lapse function
resolution not great (12MP)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX Landscape photography information
Kodak M380 Landscape photography information
28
pretty good screen size (3")
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
26
good sized screen (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging info
Kodak M380 Vlogging info
62
selfie friendly display
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
no mic jack
22
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than competition (155g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M380 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Kodak M380
 Casio Exilim TRYXKodak EasyShare M380
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Kodak EasyShare M380
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2011-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 38-190mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range 8cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1448s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 2.50 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 155 grams (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $689 $160