Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Announced January 2011
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Overview

Following is a in-depth overview of the Casio TRYX and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TRYX was revealed 13 months after the M575 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TRYX grades against the M575 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak M575

 TRYX M575 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2010More modern by 13 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio TRYX

 M575 TRYX 

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak M575

 TRYX M575 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX has outer dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Casio TRYX and Kodak M575 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TRYX and the M575.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and M575 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and M575.

Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak M575 to resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern TRYX is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio TRYX Street photography details
Kodak M575 Street photography details
58
screen articulates fully
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (152g)
low max ISO (1,000)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio TRYX
Sports photography with Kodak M575
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
26
resolution is good (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX Travel photography info
Kodak M575 Travel photography info
56
selfie friendly display
no Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
68
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
28
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
40
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inches)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio TRYX
Vlogging with Kodak M575
62
selfie friendly display
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
no mic socket
28
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone support
more heavy than competition (152g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio TRYX vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim TRYXKodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim TRYX Kodak EasyShare M575
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-01-05 2010-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1000
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 21mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 -
Macro focus range 8cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/8 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.50 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 152 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $689 $139